Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Alina Charaeva vs Clara Burel Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Charaeva vs Burel analysis and find out who is favored!
Alina Charaeva vs Clara Burel Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Charaeva 1 - 0 Burel
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Charaeva has won 45.89% of points on their second serve, while Burel has won 42.47%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Charaeva, in recent form, has won 61.19% of their opponent's second serve points, while Burel has won 58.15%. The same stats for first serve returns are 40.84% and 40.22% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Charaeva has saved 58.62% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Burel has saved 51.78% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Charaeva has won 68.85% of matches played (W/L 42/ 19), with Burel winning 63.49% (W/L 40/ 23) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Charaeva has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 68% (W/L 44/ 21), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 63% (W/L 22/ 13). Burel has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 68% (W/L 44/ 21), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 55% (W/L 76/ 62).
- Player level: In the last year, Charaeva has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 68.85% of matches (W/L 42/ 19), where as Burel has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 66.67% of matches (W/L 18/ 9). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Charaeva winning 1 times and Burel being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Charaeva winning 2 and Burel winning 1. The last match between Charaeva and Burel was at the W25 Marbella, 03-09-2020, Second, Clay with Alina Charaeva getting the victory 6-4 3-6 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:50:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Charaeva and Burel have played a deciding set 1 times, with Charaeva winning 1 times and Burel 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Charaeva winning 0, and Burel 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Charaeva has played against opponents with an average rank of 294.97 while Burel has played against players with an average rank of 187.44.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Charaeva has won 63% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Burel has won 64% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Charaeva has converted 48.89% of breakpoint opportunities, and Burel has converted 50.31% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
300
Rank
300
High
22
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
44
Rank
43
High
23
Age
Plays
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
Form
L
L
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
66% (119-60)
Career Total W/L
59% (164-114)
64% (7-4)
YTD W/L
50% (14-14)
$5,000
Career Prize Money
$1,267,550
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Alina Charaeva | Clara Burel |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 15 | 14 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 12 | 7 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:50:0 | 2:50:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (59/101) | 58% (59/101) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 68% (40/59) | 59% (35/59) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 31% (13/42) | 43% (18/42) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 33% (6/18) | 38% (6/16) |
| Return Points W% | 48% (48/101) | 48% (48/101) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 3-6 6-4 |
Stats 
Alina Charaeva
Player
Clara Burel
58%
(
59 of
101)
1st Serve %
58%
(
59 of
101)
3
Aces
0
12
Double Faults
7
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
35 of
59)
31%
(
13 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
33%
(
6 of
18)
Break Points Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
48%
(
48 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
48 of
101)
101
Total Points Won
101
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Alina Charaeva | Clara Burel |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 64% (7/4) | 50% (14/14) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 56% (15/12) | 49% (33/35) |
| Games Win/Loss | 55% (139/114) | 50% (317/315) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 60% (3/2) | 54% (7/6) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 42% (5/7) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 67% (4/2) | 67% (2/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.38 | 0.25 |
| Aces Total | 47 | 78 |
| DFs per game | 0.41 | 0.5 |
| DFs Total | 50 | 155 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:3:38 | 1:44:1 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 433.18 | 137.79 |
| 1st Serve % | 57% (497/872) | 55% (1142/2094) |
| 1st Serve W% | 65% (325/497) | 62% (707/1142) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 44% (165/375) | 42% (399/952) |
| BPs Won% Total | 48% (58/120) | 49% (131/269) |
| Return Pts W% | 48% (408/843) | 47% (1000/2148) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/2) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 38% (3/5) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 58% (7/5) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 64% (7/4) | 67% (2/1) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 64% (7/11) | 50% (14/28) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/4) | 14% (1/7) |
| Deciding Set W% | 80% (4/5) | 58% (7/12) |
| 1st set W, W | 86% (7/6) | 77% (13/10) |
| 1st set W, L | 14% (7/1) | 23% (13/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 25% (4/1) | 27% (15/4) |
Alina Charaeva Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Manon Leonard
Player
Alina Charaeva
78%
(
39 of
50)
1st Serve %
46%
(
25 of
54)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
9 of
29)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
17 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alina Charaeva
Player
Nahia Berecoechea
59%
(
24 of
41)
1st Serve %
58%
(
25 of
43)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
63%
(
15 of
24)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
11%
(
2 of
18)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
39%
(
16 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
72%
(
31 of
43)
56
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alina Charaeva
Player
Ekaterina Reyngold
55%
(
66 of
121)
1st Serve %
57%
(
60 of
106)
2
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
11
62%
(
41 of
66)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
37 of
60)
47%
(
26 of
55)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
16 of
46)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
45%
(
54 of
121)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
53 of
106)
120
Total Points Won
107
|
6-7(6) 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Manon Leonard
Player
Alina Charaeva
47%
(
32 of
68)
1st Serve %
53%
(
38 of
72)
4
Aces
8
5
Double Faults
8
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
30 of
38)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
10 of
34)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
32 of
72)
75
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alina Charaeva
Player
Polina Iatcenko
65%
(
56 of
86)
1st Serve %
68%
(
60 of
88)
7
Aces
2
9
Double Faults
2
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
36 of
60)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
40%
(
34 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
38 of
88)
90
Total Points Won
84
|
7-5 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Fiona Ferro
Player
Alina Charaeva
55%
(
44 of
80)
1st Serve %
59%
(
60 of
101)
0
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
38 of
60)
53%
(
19 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
15 of
41)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
32 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
48 of
101)
96
Total Points Won
85
|
6-4 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alina Charaeva
Player
Ekaterina Reyngold
62%
(
64 of
104)
1st Serve %
61%
(
62 of
101)
5
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
7
56%
(
36 of
64)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
34 of
62)
53%
(
21 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
14 of
39)
40%
(
8 of
20)
Break Points Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
45%
(
47 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
53 of
101)
110
Total Points Won
95
|
6-4 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Marina Bassols Ribera
Player
Alina Charaeva
62%
(
60 of
97)
1st Serve %
51%
(
53 of
103)
0
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
2
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
34 of
53)
32%
(
12 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
22 of
50)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
44%
(
43 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
47 of
103)
101
Total Points Won
99
|
4-6 7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alina Charaeva
Player
Lena Couto
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
63)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
17 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
35 of
63)
69
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alina Charaeva
Player
Julia Avdeeva
60%
(
43 of
72)
1st Serve %
56%
(
48 of
86)
3
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
8
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
12 of
38)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
40%
(
29 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
48 of
86)
91
Total Points Won
67
|
6-1 3-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Clara Burel Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Anna Kalinskaya
Player
Clara Burel
70%
(
64 of
91)
1st Serve %
51%
(
44 of
87)
1
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
2
52%
(
33 of
64)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
20 of
44)
37%
(
10 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
43)
42%
(
8 of
19)
Break Points Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
53%
(
48 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
50 of
87)
93
Total Points Won
85
|
7-6(3) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Danielle Rose Collins
Player
Clara Burel
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve %
51%
(
26 of
51)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
14 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
57
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Clara Burel
Player
Elina Svitolina
54%
(
50 of
92)
1st Serve %
71%
(
77 of
108)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
41 of
77)
40%
(
17 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
43%
(
40 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
52 of
108)
104
Total Points Won
96
|
7-6(1) 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Clara Burel
Player
Karolina Pliskova
50%
(
51 of
102)
1st Serve %
64%
(
43 of
67)
3
Aces
2
13
Double Faults
7
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
49%
(
25 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
45%
(
46 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
67)
87
Total Points Won
82
|
7-5 0-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Naomi Osaka
Player
Clara Burel
56%
(
34 of
61)
1st Serve %
48%
(
31 of
65)
8
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
19 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
30 of
65)
72
Total Points Won
54
|
7-6(2) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Celine Naef
Player
Clara Burel
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve %
53%
(
33 of
62)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
6
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
25 of
33)
80%
(
16 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
26 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Clara Burel
Player
Zeynep Sonmez
51%
(
57 of
111)
1st Serve %
63%
(
81 of
129)
3
Aces
1
16
Double Faults
7
74%
(
42 of
57)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
49 of
81)
37%
(
20 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
19 of
48)
39%
(
7 of
18)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
44%
(
49 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
61 of
129)
123
Total Points Won
117
|
6-7(4) 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Clara Burel
Player
Elsa Jacquemot
50%
(
29 of
58)
1st Serve %
58%
(
34 of
59)
2
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
5
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
22 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
32 of
59)
68
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Olga Danilovic
Player
Clara Burel
70%
(
73 of
105)
1st Serve %
53%
(
62 of
118)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
9
53%
(
39 of
73)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
34 of
62)
34%
(
11 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
20 of
56)
53%
(
9 of
17)
Break Points Won
71%
(
10 of
14)
52%
(
55 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
64 of
118)
114
Total Points Won
109
|
3-6 7-6(8) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Elena Gabriela Ruse
Player
Clara Burel
60%
(
46 of
77)
1st Serve %
59%
(
44 of
75)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
45%
(
35 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
40 of
75)
82
Total Points Won
70
|
6-0 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Charaeva Vs Burel Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
